构架式塔基础;三种计算模型;自振周期对比分析 ," />

构架式塔基础;三种计算模型;自振周期对比分析 ,"/>

reinforced concrete frame foundation for tower-type equipment, three calculation models,comparison of period

,"/> <b><span class="msoIns"><b>PKPM软件三种计算模型下构架式塔基础的自振周期对比分析</b></span></b><b><span class="msoIns"></span></b>

石油化工设计 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 47-51.

• 工程应用 • 上一篇    下一篇

PKPM软件三种计算模型下构架式塔基础的自振周期对比分析

焦盈盈   

  1. 中国石化工程建设有限公司,100101
  • 出版日期:2025-05-25 发布日期:2025-05-14
  • 作者简介:焦盈盈,女,2014年毕业于中国石油大学(华东)土木工程专业,工学学士,主要从事结构设计工作,工程师。电话:84877894。

Comparison of the Period of Reinforced Concrete Frame Foundation for Tower-type Equipment with Three Calculation Models Using PKPM

Jiao Yingying   

  1. SINOPEC Engineering Incorporation, Beijing, 100101
  • Online:2025-05-25 Published:2025-05-14

摘要:

塔构架式基础属于混合结构,随着石化行业的迅速发展,塔型设备也越来越高、越来越大、越来越重,那么塔本身的刚度对钢筋混凝土构架式基础的自振周期的影响也越来越大。参考已有工程经验,利用PKPM软件的3种计算模型对钢筋混凝土构架式塔型设备基础的自振周期进行对比分析,结果表明,模拟方式不同时构架式塔基础的自振周期不同。

关键词:

">

text-indent:21.0pt, 构架式塔基础;三种计算模型;自振周期对比分析 ')">"> 构架式塔基础;三种计算模型;自振周期对比分析

Abstract:

Reinforced concrete frame foundation for tower-type equipment belongs to hybrid structures. With the rapid development of the petrochemical industry, tower type equipment is becoming taller, larger and heavier. Therefore, the stiffness of the equipment has a greater impact on the period of reinforced concrete frame foundations. Referring to existing engineering experience, three calculation models using PKPM software were used to compare and analyze the period of reinforced concrete frame foundation for tower-type equipment. The results showed that the period was different when the simulation method of the tower was different.

Key words:

reinforced concrete frame foundation for tower-type equipment, three calculation models')">

reinforced concrete frame foundation for tower-type equipment, three calculation models, ')">comparison of period