石油化工设计 ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 20-23.doi: 10.3969 /j.issn.1005-8168.2019.04.006

• 工艺优化 • 上一篇    下一篇

加氢裂化装置汽提塔流程与脱丁烷塔流程比较

李征容   

  1. 中国石化工程建设有限公司,北京 100101
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-15 接受日期:2019-07-15 出版日期:2019-12-09 发布日期:2019-12-09
  • 通讯作者: 李征容,lizhengrong@sei.com.cn E-mail:lizhengrong@sei.com.cn
  • 作者简介:李征容,男,2009年毕业于清华大学化工工程与技术专业,工学硕士,高级工程师,长期从事加氢工艺设计工作。联系电话:010-84875195;E-mail:lizhengrong@sei.com.cn

A Comparison between Stripper Process and Debutanizer Process for Hydrocracking Unit

Li Zhengrong   

  1. SINOPEC Engineering Incorporation, Beijing, 100101
  • Received:2019-07-15 Accepted:2019-07-15 Online:2019-12-09 Published:2019-12-09
  • Contact: Li Zhengrong,lizhengrong@sei.com.cn E-mail:lizhengrong@sei.com.cn

摘要: 加氢裂化装置分馏部分工艺流程包括汽提塔流程和脱丁烷塔流程两种,以典型150万t/a加氢裂化装置为例,分析了两种流程的区别,通过流程模拟,对两种流程的设备投资、操作费用和产品性质进行比较。脱丁烷塔流程设备投资、操作费用均高于汽提塔流程,但脱丁烷塔流程的液化气产品收率高于汽提塔流程,轻石脑油产品中C1~C4组分、H2O、H2S含量均低于汽提塔流程,重石脑油产品的稳定性好于汽提塔流程。炼厂可根据实际情况和侧重点,选择较为合适的流程

关键词: 加氢裂化, 汽提塔, 脱丁烷塔

Abstract: The fractionation process of hydrocracking unit mainly consists of stripper process and debutanizer process. Taking a 1.5 Mt/a hydrocracking unit as an example, this article analyzes the differences between stripper process and debutanizer process, and compares them in aspects of equipment investment, operating cost and product properties through process simulation. The conclusion is that the equipment investment and operating cost of debutanizer process are higher than those of stripper process, but the LPG product properties of debutanizer process are better than those of the stripper process. The contents of C1~C4, H2O and H2S in light naphtha products of debutanizer process are lower than those of stripper process, and the stability of heavy naphtha products of debutanizer process is better than that of stripper process. Refineries can select appropriate processes according to the actual conditions.

Key words: hydrocracking, stripper, debutanizer