石油化工设计 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 56-59.doi: 10.3969 /j.issn.1005-8168.2020.04.014

• 工程应用 • 上一篇    下一篇

加氢裂化装置石脑油产品分离流程比较

李征容   

  1. 中国石化工程建设有限公司,北京 100101
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-14 接受日期:2020-04-14 出版日期:2020-11-20 发布日期:2020-11-20
  • 通讯作者: 李征容,lizhengrong@sei.com.cn E-mail:lizhengrong@sei.com.cn
  • 作者简介:李征容,男,2009年毕业于清华大学化工工程与技术专业,工学硕士,高级工程师,主要从事加氢工艺设计工作。联系电话:010-84875195;E-mail:lizhengrong@sei.com.cn

Comparison of Naphtha Product Separation Processes for Hydrocracking Unit

Li Zhengrong   

  1. SINOPEC Engineering Incorporation, Beijing, 100101
  • Received:2020-04-14 Accepted:2020-04-14 Online:2020-11-20 Published:2020-11-20
  • Contact: Li Zhengrong,lizhengrong@sei.com.cn E-mail:lizhengrong@sei.com.cn

摘要: 加氢裂化装置石脑油产品分离流程主要有分馏塔顶出轻石脑油流程和分馏塔顶出全馏分石脑油流程2种。以典型200万t/a加氢裂化装置为例,分析了2种流程的区别:通过流程模拟,对2种流程的操作费用、装置投资和产品性质进行比较。分馏塔顶出轻石脑油流程的优势为操作费用低、装置投资低;分馏塔顶出全馏分石脑油流程优势在于轻、重石脑油产品切割更为清晰。炼厂可根据实际情况和侧重点,选择较为合适的流程

关键词: 加氢裂化, 轻石脑油, 重石脑油

Abstract: The naphtha product separation processes of hydrocracking unit mainly include light naphtha effluent from fractionator overhead and full-range naphtha effluent from fractionator overhead. Taking a 2.0 MMTA hydrocracking unit as an example, this article analyzes the differences between the two processes, and compares them in operating cost, investment and product properties through process simulation. The advantages of light naphtha effluent from fractionator overhead process are the low operating cost and low investment, while the advantage of full-range naphtha effluent from fractionator overhead process is the clear cutting of light naphtha and heavy naphtha. Refineries can select appropriate process according to the actual conditions.

Key words: hydrocracking, light naphtha, heavy naphtha