催化裂化 ,回炼比 ,分馏塔 ,分馏二中 ," /> 催化裂化 ,回炼比 ,分馏塔 ,分馏二中 ,"/> <b>催化裂化装置主分馏塔中段取热设计探讨</b>

石油化工设计 ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 1-3.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8168.2021.03.001

• 设计技术 •    下一篇

催化裂化装置主分馏塔中段取热设计探讨

许步建,谢恪谦

许步建,谢恪谦   

  1. 中石油华东设计院有限公司,山东 青岛 266071
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-26 出版日期:2021-08-25 发布日期:2021-08-09
  • 作者简介:许步建,男,2013年毕业于天津大学化学工程专业,硕士,主要从事炼油设计工作,工程师。E-mail:xubujian-hqc@cnpc.com.cn,电话:15266259371

Discussion on Heat Recovery Design of Main Fractionator in FCC Unit

Xu Bujian, Xie Keqian   

  1. CNPC EastChina Design Institute Co., Ltd., Qingdao, Shandong, 266071
  • Received:2020-10-26 Online:2021-08-25 Published:2021-08-09
  • Contact: E-mail:xubujian-hqc@cnpc.com.cn

摘要:

催化裂化装置分馏塔将反应油气精馏后,一方面抽出多股物流作为产品;另一方面建立多个中段回收反应油气的热量。早期由于催化剂活性低,装置回炼比大,分馏塔单独设置一个中段回流会造成该中段附近塔盘液相负荷大,进而导致分馏塔塔径增大。为了减小分馏塔塔径,降低投资,现在运行的好多老装置都分别设置了一中段回流和二中段回流。装置A工况1和工况2的流程模拟结果显示:设置二中段回流后,分馏塔塔径可减小约300 mm。近年来,催化剂活性的提高及装置产品方案的变化,导致大部分催化裂化装置回炼比都降低至0.1左右。此时,探讨取消分馏二中、降低分馏塔操作难度的问题,也就成为了可能。流程模拟结果显示,工况1和工况3的分馏塔塔径相同,表明在取消分馏二中同时降低回炼比的条件下,分馏塔可以利旧。考虑到此类改造通常在停工检修期间实施,工期有限,利旧分馏塔大大减小了施工周期。同时,合理优化的分馏一中换热流程将约95%的热量用来做重沸器热源;另外,分馏塔油浆系统取热比例也提高了约10%。以上两种措施都使得分馏塔的能量利用更高效。文章的探讨对有类似情况的装置提供了一个合理的、可选择的改造思路

关键词: 催化裂化 ')">

催化裂化 , 回炼比 , 分馏塔 , 分馏二中

Abstract:

 The fractionator of FCC unit distillates the reaction oil and gas, and then draws out several streams as the products and sets up multiple middle sections to recover the heat of the reaction oil and gas. In the early stage, due to the low catalyst activity and high recycle ratio of the unit, a separate mid-pumparound for the fractionator would result in high liquid load in the trays near the middle section, thus increasing the diameter of the fractionator. In order to reduce the diameter of the fractionator and the investment, many existing units in operation are equipped with two mid-pumparounds, that is, light cycle oil (LCO) and heavy cycle oil (HCO). The simulation results of unit A in Case 1 and Case 2 show that the diameter of the fractionator can be reduced by about 300 mm after setting the HCO. In recent years, with the improvement of catalyst activity and the change in product plan of the unit, the recycle ratio of most FCC units has been reduced to about 0.1. At this point, it is possible to discuss canceling the HCO and reducing the operation difficulty of fractionator. The simulation results show that the diameters of fractionator in Case 1 and Case 3 are the same, which indicates that the existing fractionator can be used under the conditions of canceling the HCO and reducing the recycle ratio at the same time. Considering that such modification is usually carried out during overhaul and the time is limited, the utilization of the existing fractionator greatly shortens the construction period. At the same time, about 95% of the heat is used as the heat source of reboiler in the reasonably optimized heat exchange process of the LCO. In addition, the heat recovery ratio of the slurry system of fractionator is increased by about 10%. The above two measures can improve the energy utilization efficiency of the fractionator. This paper provides a reasonable and alternative modification idea for similar units.

Key words: catalytic cracking/FCC, recycle ratio, fractionating tower, heavy cycle oil