石油化工设计 ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 53-57.doi: 10.3969 /j.issn.1005-8168.2019.04.014

• 标准规范 • 上一篇    下一篇

现行工业压力管道定期检验有关规范探讨

梁春雷,胡明东,杨雄,徐万宝,闫艳伟   

  1. 合肥通用机械研究院有限公司,国家压力容器与管道安全工程技术研究中心,安徽 合肥 230031
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-02 接受日期:2019-04-02 出版日期:2019-12-09 发布日期:2019-12-09
  • 通讯作者: 梁春雷,lchunlei@126.com E-mail:lchunlei@126.com
  • 作者简介:梁春雷,男,2006年毕业于北京工业大学材料科学与工程学院,硕士,高级工程师,主要研究方向为石化装置腐蚀与防护、特种设备检验检测等。联系电话:0551-65335832;E-mail:lchunlei@126.com

Discussion on Current Specifications for Periodic Inspection of Industrial Pressure Piping

Liang Chunlei, Hu Mingdong, Yang Xiong, Xu Wanbao, Yan Yanwei   

  1. Hefei General Machinery Research Institute Co., Ltd., Hefei, Anhui, 230031
  • Received:2019-04-02 Accepted:2019-04-02 Online:2019-12-09 Published:2019-12-09
  • Contact: Liang Chunlei, lchunlei@126.com E-mail:lchunlei@126.com

摘要: TSG D7005—2018《压力管道定期检验规则——工业管道》已于2018年5月1日起正式实施,与2003版试行检验规范相比,该规范在检验周期、检测比例、腐蚀减薄评级、压力试验、安全附件检验等方面均有明显变化。探讨了该规范的关键内容变化之处,并梳理了其与TSG D0001—2009《压力管道安全技术监察规程——工业管道》、TSG 21—2016《固定式压力容器安全技术监察规程》之间的联系,修订内容体现了我国特种设备法规体系的系统性和一致性。现行规范对于管道经重大修理改造、停用后重新启用等情况下的压力试验没有明确规定,对于达到设计使用年限使用的压力管道的定期检验也没有相关规定。建议开展相关研究,完善相关规范,保障压力管道的本质安全。建议超期服役的压力管道采用RBI方法进行定期检验,对存在随时间劣化机理的管道采取有针对性的检测手段,切实降低运行风险

关键词: 压力管道, 工业管道, 定期检验, 压力试验, 设计使用年限, 超期服役

Abstract: TSG D7005-2018 Periodic Inspection Regulation for Industrial Pressure Piping has been formally implemented since May 1, 2018. Compared with the 2003 version of trial inspection regulation, this specification has obvious changes in inspection period, detection ratio, corrosion thinning rating, pressure test, safety accessory inspection and other aspects. This paper discusses the major content changes in this specification, and sorts out its relations with TSG D0001-2009 Pressure Pipe Safety Technology Supervision Regulation for Industrial Pressure Pipe and TSG 21-2016 Supervision Regulation on Safety Technology for Stationary Pressure Vessel. The revision reflects the systematicness and consistency of Chinese special equipment specification system. The current specification has no clear provisions for the pressure test of pipelines subjected to major repair or transformation or reused after deactivation. There are also no relevant provisions for the periodic inspection of pressure piping that reaches the designed service life. It is suggested that relevant studies should be carried out, and relevant specifications should be perfected to ensure the intrinsic safety of pressure piping. It is also suggested that Risk Based Inspection should be adopted for the periodic inspection of overtime serviced pressure piping, and targeted detection means should be adopted for piping with deterioration mechanism over time to effectively reduce operational risks

Key words: pressure piping, industrial piping, periodic inspection, pressure test, designed service life, overtime service