石油化工设计 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 48-53.

• 工程应用 • 上一篇    下一篇

3000m³CO2球罐结构抗震分析研究

陈梦真 李永泰 戴兴旺 朱金花   

  1. 合肥通用机械研究院有限公司,合肥 230031
  • 出版日期:2026-02-25 发布日期:2026-02-25
  • 作者简介:陈梦真,女,2018年毕业于湖南大学工程力学专业,本科学历,助理工程师,主要从事压力容器设计工作。联系电话:0551-65335401;E-mail:1311780627@qq.com

Seismic Analysis of Structure of a 3000m³ CO2 Spherical Tank

Chen Mengzhen, Li Yongtai, Dai Xingwang, Zhu Jinhua   

  1. Hefei General Machinery Research Institute Co., Ltd, Hefei, Anhui, 230031
  • Online:2026-02-25 Published:2026-02-25

摘要: 对3000m3的CO2球罐分别按抗震设防烈度6度0.05G、7度0.1G、0.15G,8度0.2G、0.3G,9度0.4G,采用GB/T12337标准,文献[4]的方法 ,有限元分析计算法3种方式,计算球罐水平刚度、自振周期、地震响应系数及风振系数及组合水平载荷,计算支柱、拉杆(要求耳板、销子与拉杆等强度设计)、地脚螺栓等结构件的应力并进行校核,比较这3种方法的计算结果发现:按现行GB/T12337标准计算结果与有限元分析计算结果的相差较大,文献[4]与有限元分析计算结果相近,刚好满足GB/T12337标准要求结构,按文献[4]和有限元计算支柱应力不满足强度和稳定性要求,有限元计算支柱当量应力比GB/T12337标准大47.2%。目前球罐设计标准正在修改,建议球罐设计标准这次修改采用更精确的计算方法,保证按标准设计的球罐,在各种工况的安全。

关键词: 球罐, 球壳, 支柱, 拉杆, 销子, 地脚螺栓, 抗震设防烈度, 自振周期, 地震和风水平载荷, 球罐下极水平位移

Abstract:

This study analyzes a 3000m3 CO2 spherical tank under seismic fortification intensities of 6-degree (0.05G), 7-degree (0.1G, 0.15G), 8-degree (0.2G, 0.3G), and 9-degree (0.4G), adopting three methods including the current GB/T12337, the methodology described in reference [4], and finite element analysis (FEA). The horizontal stiffness, natural vibration period, seismic response coefficient, wind vibration coefficient and combined horizontal load of the spherical tank are calculated. The stresses of structural components such as pillars, tie rods (with the requirement of equal strength design for lug plates, dowels, and tie rods) and anchor bolts are calculated and checked. By comparing the calculation results of these three methods, it is found that the calculation results according to the current GB/T12337 standard differ greatly from those obtained through FEA. The calculation results of the reference [4] are similar to those of FEA and just meet the structural requirements of the GB/T12337 standard. Both the reference [4] and FEA methods indicate that the stress of pillars does not meet the requirements of strength and stability. The equivalent stress of pillars calculated by FEA is 47.2% greater than that calculated by the GB/T12337 standard. As the standard for spherical tanks is currently under revision, it is recommended that more precise computational methods should be adopted in this revision to ensure the safety of standard-designed spherical tanks under all operating conditions.

Key words: spherical tank, spherical shell, pillar, tie rod, dowel;anchor bolt, seismic fortification intensity, natural vibration period, seismic and wind horizontal loads, horizontal displacement of the lower pole of spherical tank