石油化工设计 ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 75-78.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8168.2019.02.020

• 综述 • 上一篇    

中美石油化工工艺管道抗震规范的对比研究

张军文   

  1. 中国石化工程建设有限公司,北京 100101
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-29 接受日期:2018-01-31 出版日期:2019-05-30 发布日期:2019-05-30
  • 通讯作者: 张军文,zhangjunwen@sei.com.cn E-mail:zhangjunwen@sei.com.cn
  • 作者简介:张军文,男,2008年毕业于北京化工大学化工机械专业,工学硕士,已发表论文4篇,高级工程师,主要从事管道设计和管道应力分析工作.联系电话:010-84875117; E-mail: zhangjunwen@sei.com.cn

Comparative Study between Chinese and American Seismic Standards for Non-Buried Pipes in Petrochemical Industry

Zhang Junwen   

  1. SINOPEC Engineering Incorporation, Beijing, 100101
  • Received:2018-01-29 Accepted:2018-01-31 Online:2019-05-30 Published:2019-05-30
  • Contact: Zhang Junwen,zhangjunwe@sei.com.cn E-mail:zhangjunwen@sei.com.cn

摘要: 抗震设计已经成为现代化工程设计尤其是海外工程项目非常重要的组成部分。对于海外项目,熟悉并了解国外规范尤其是美国规范是抗震设计的基本前提。主要通过对现行石油化工非埋地金属管道抗震标准SH/T 3039与美国规范ASCE 7和UBC 1997中关于管道抗震设防目标、管道抗震验算条件、地震系数计算、基本荷载组合中荷载分项系数取值几个核心方面比较分析,得出中美管道抗震标准的异同,以此来加深对美国石油化工非埋地金属管道抗震规范的了解和掌握

关键词: 抗震设防目标, 地震系数, SH/T 3039, ASCE 7, UBC 1997

Abstract: Seismic design has become an important part of modern engineering design especially in overseas projects. Mastering foreign standards especially the American standards is the basic premise of the seismic design for overseas projects. This paper compares the current Chinese standard SH/T 3039 with the American standards ASCE 7 and UBC 1997 concerning the seismic design of non-buried metal pipes for petrochemical industry from the aspects of seismic fortification goals, seismic checking conditions, seismic coefficient calculation, and the selection of load partial coefficient in basic load combination, and points out their similarities and differences, so as to deepen the understanding and mastery of the American standards concerning the seismic design of non-buried metal pipe for petrochemical industry

Key words: seismic fortification goal, seismic coefficient, SH/T 3039, ASCE 7, UBC 1997